Excellent week in lazybags theater. Stay inside and watch the best film of 2019, one hell of a performance, and an unreasonably underseen action flick in which Schwarzenegger gets off the funniest line of his career.
“Remember this, my friends. There is no such thing as bad
plants or bad men. There are only bad cultivators.”
Victor Hugo penned those words as he watched the suffering
and oppression in the streets of Montfermeil.
Set in July 2018, when the World Cup victory made
celebratory compatriots of everyone in France, at first blush, Ladj Ly’s film Les
Miserables bears little resemblance to the saga of Jean Valjean and that
tenacious Javert. But it doesn’t take long for the filmmaker to use the story
of law enforcement and the population of modern day Montfermeil to show that
little has changed since Hugo set quill to parchment 150 years ago.
Damien Bonnard (Staying Vertical) plays Stéphane. Ly taps Julien Poupard’s camera to follow Stephane on his first day in Paris as part of a three man unit tasked with keeping an eye on a mainly poor, primarily Muslim district.
Stéphane’s new partners, Chris (Alexis Manenti) and Gwada (Djibril Zonga), have been on the job long enough to have developed relationships and tensions in the neighborhood. Thanks to an almost absurd subplot involving a traveling circus—whose lion delivers an apt metaphor and a heartbreaking scene—Stephane’s first days on the force will be regrettable.
Ly was inspired to write the film by riots that broke out in
his own apartment building and neighborhood in 2005. That authenticity lends
the film both a visceral dread as well as a complicated compassion.
Like Hugo, Ly seems unwilling to abandon those in authority
to the fate of villain any more than he’s willing to entirely forgive the
actions of the oppressed. Rather, each side is implicated (one far more boldly
than the other), but it’s the lack of tidy resolution that makes the fate of
these characters compelling.
While every performance is impressive, young Issa Perica is
the film’s beating heart, its undetermined destiny, and he’s more than up to
the task. His lines are limited but his performance is heartbreaking, his
character really the only one that matters.
A devastating social commentary masquerading quite convincingly as an intense cop drama, I’d say Les Miserables would do Hugo proud. The truth is, it would probably break his heart.
Alfre Woodard has primarily provided crucial supporting
turns in film and television since 1978. With writer/director Chinonye Chukwu’s
Clemency, Woodard delivers an astonishing lead turn as a prison warden dealing
with inmates on death row.
Examining capital punishment from the eyes of a prison
warden is certainly a novel approach. The warden has generally been
relinquished on film to a cowboy hat wearing good ol’ boy with no qualms about
flipping that switch. Chukwu and Woodard are disinterested in clichés. Instead they
carve out something truly new in this genre.
The thing Chukwu gets most right in this film is an
overwhelming sense of responsibility and grief, and it’s a tough line to toe. Warden
Bernadine Williams understands that, while her own grief threatens to swallow
her whole, it doesn’t compare with the pain she comes in contact with. For that
reason, she never defends her position or betrays her sympathies when
confronted by victims’ families, the families of the condemned or the condemned
themselves.
Her own grief is so acutely individual that she refuses to
seek sympathy and she outright rejects empathy, because who could put
themselves in her place? She is in charge but has no control. She is
responsible, yet she does not determine these men’s fates.
If Chukwu hits the right notes here, it’s Woodard who sings.
This journeyman has played just about everything across her four decades in the
business, and she brings a palpable sense of hard won wisdom to this role.
The film is essentially a character study, and one of a
character determined not to discuss or betray her feelings. That’s a tough nut
to crack because you have to let the audience know what’s going on without telling
us anything at all. More than that, what Woodard has to convey is far beyond
the scope of what anyone in the audience can really understand. And yet, she
succeeds poignantly.
Aldis Hodge, playing death row inmate Anthony Woods,
balances Woodard’s practiced stoicism with barely contained jolts of emotion. Clemency
gives Hodge the opportunity to shine and he grabs it, conveying a tumult of raw
feelings that will leave you heartbroken.
If Clemency is a miraculous package of performances, it doesn’t entirely work as a film. Bernadine’s story—her existential crisis—doesn’t have a beginning or an end, just an unhappy middle. But maybe that’s necessary for a film that breaks new ground while delivering the same message: we need criminal justice reform.
Such was modern dance legend Marce Cunningham’s wry, almost tickled description of one reaction to a performance. An enigmatic presence on and offstage, he makes for a fascinating if ultimately unknowable center to documentarian Alla Kovgan’s new documentary.
With Cunningham, the filmmaker seeks to reignite the
peculiar audience response the dancer/choreographer’s performances once
garnered, and perhaps drive wider appreciation for his work.
Kovgan chronicles the ways in which Cunningham challenged
the traditional concept of dance, combining ballet and modern choreography and
creating works without relation to music. His avant garde approach drew the
attention and collaboration of other boundary-pushing artists of the time,
including Andy Warhol, Robert Rauschenberg, and Cunningham’s eventual life
partner, John Cage.
Speaking of his interest in Cunningham’s work, Cage says, “I
would like to have an art that was so bewildering, complex and illogical that
we would return to everyday life with great pleasure.”
Kovgan goes about exploring not only that very work but the mind and imagination behind it through an appealing combination of archival footage, audio and onscreen text, as well as re-stagings of some of the artist’s most memorable pieces.
The result is provocatively piecemeal, a visually arresting
if intentionally untidy image of Cunningham’s life and work. Most often, Kovgan’s
style suits the content beautifully, but other times it’s a misfit.
Where Wim Wenders employed 3D to immerse the viewer in the
dance of Pina, Kovgan is as concerned with the surrounding as the movement.
She stages performances on rooftop, in meadows, among trees and within train
tunnels. While the combination creates a vibrant visual impression, it steals
emphasis from the movement itself, which feels out of step with Cunningham’s
most basic philosophy.
Kovgan takes chances, capturing the dance from above, close up, far away, and at odd angles. This sometimes creates a vibrant, off kilter sensibility that complements the material. At other times, you wish you could see more of the dancers, feeling as if you’re missing something amazing in favor of needless close up footage of a face.
It’s a small knock, honestly, with dances this arresting and accompanying material this compelling. Kovgan’s respect for the work as well as the life of her subject is clear and she’s captured much of that spirit.
HP Lovecraft has influenced horror cinema in ways too varied
and numerous to really articulate. But true Lovecraft is tough to bring to the
screen for a number of reasons, chief among them that his madness tends to
involve something indescribable: a color no one’s ever seen before, a sound
entirely new to the human ear, a shape that defies all laws of geography and
logic.
Alex Garland pulled inspiration from Lovecraft’s 1927 short Colour
Out of Space for his brilliant 2018 mindbender, Annihilation.
But for direct adaptations, Richard Stanley’s newest may be the best.
Naturally, the film’s success is due in large part to
Nicolas Cage’s performance, because who descends into madness quite as
entertainingly?
Cage plays Nathan Gardner. Nathan and his wife (Joely
Richardson), their three kids and their squatter (Tommy Chong – nice!) live a
quiet life in the New England forest not far from Arkham. A meteorite changes
all that.
Cage basically strums a favorite old tune, landing somewhere on his “nice guy gone insane” spectrum just this side of Brent (Mom and Dad) and Red Miller (Mandy). In fact, the voice that begins emerging once the meteorite hits is gleefully reminiscent of Peter Lowe from Vampire’s Kiss (a call back I can get behind).
Is that the only reason to see the movie? No. Tommy Chong is
a hoot, Richardson gets one especially creepy carrot chopping scene, and things
go a little Cronenberg just when you want them to.
There’s a lot wrong with the film, too. Scenes are sloppily
slapped together, one rarely leading to the next. The film’s budget is betrayed
by its FX and supporting performances are not especially strong.
But Stanley’s long-awaited comeback (this is his first narrative feature since being fired from The Island of Dr. Moreau in 1996) infuses Lovecraft with a much needed dark streak of comedy and entrenches his tale of madness within a loving family dynamic, offering an emotional center to the story that the author rarely delivered.
The film lacks the vibrant subversiveness of Mom and Dad and comes nowhere near the insane vision of Mandy, so Cage fans might be only mildly impressed. Lovecraft fans, though, have reason to be excited.
For a population of 9 million, Mexico City keeps only 45
official ambulances. Private ambulances compete with each other to fill the need
for additional resources. Midnight Family rides along with the Ochoas, one
family making their living transporting the injured to government and private
hospitals around the city.
Do they have training? The equipment they need to tend to a
medical emergency?
Hell, they may not even have gas.
The nuance of the act of goodwill or commerce tightens the
film’s emotional grip. As one member of the team worries over an infant while
police question the father, clearly unable to pay for these services, it’s
obvious that the Ochoa family takes its life saving mission seriously.
At the same time, every action is calculated: how to beat
another ambulance to an accident, how to evaluate each situation to best secure
payment, which hospital will be the most forthcoming with payment, which police
are willing to alert them to accidents in return for a bribe.
It all sounds seedy until you realize what would happen to
the injured without them.
And while you’re weighing the ghoulish balance between money
and mercy, director Luke Lorentzen shows you just how a high speed chase should
be filmed as 17-year-old Juan races and weaves his ambulance through traffic to
beat another unit to the scene. (Honestly, you’d think a group of people this
well-informed on the ills of Mexico City’s healthcare situation might be a
little less daring!)
Juan is all business, a savvy worker with ambition and wisdom to share with his little brother Josue, who rides along at night instead of getting ready to go to school. In these moments, when family members cobble together enough cash for a dinner of tuna on saltines before going home to shower without hot water, the larger context and struggle takes shape.
An urgent portrait of a system in collapse, Midnight Family also uncovers one family’s raft of hope amid an ocean of desperation.
It’s been 17 years since we last checked in on Detective Mike
Lowery (Will Smith) and his goofy partner Marcus (Martin Lawrence). One of them
has intimacy issues. One of them always wants to retire. They drive recklessly
around Miami and wreak general havoc.
In those 17 years, Generation X has gotten old.
Marcus has a grandbaby now and wants to retire again. Then Mike is almost killed, so now Marcus really wants to retire. That means frustrated Mike, desperate to reestablish his manhood by finding the guy who tried to kill him, must team up with Miami PD’s new superteam, AMMO.
That’s right, AMMO, which stands for literally the most attractive
group of police officers in the history of crime. They’re tech-tactical. They
have a drone and shit, and no one would ever notice a drone flying into the
abandoned warehouse while they do an arms deal.
But Mike don’t play that. He’s old school. And old. You know
he’s old because he’s always wearing long sleeved shirts and jackets in Miami.
Is Bad Boys for Life ludicrous? Oh, hell yes. Luckily its casual sexism and jingoism are offset by its refreshing pro-violence stance.
Directors Adil El Arbi and Bilail Fallah—whose Shakespearean take on Brussels gang violence, Black, is well worth finding—offer no such lyrical balance of carnage and emotion here. It’s actually hard to imagine a film franchise so single-mindedly opposite of their insightful gangster drama.
It’s clear the marching orders were: get the bad boys back together, blow stuff up and trade quips! Fine, but who ordered all the forced ridiculousness and tonal whiplash?
Saddled with a breathtakingly by-the-numbers script by committee (Chris Bremner, Peter Craig and Joe Carnahan), the directing duo punctuates dramatic moments with comic relief while they distract from a weak story with nonsensical car chases and explosions, and when all else fails, fall back on daddy issues.
Don’t look at the credits and you’d swear Michael Bay directed this movie. (Bonus: Bay has a cameo.)
The film broaches interesting themes as one partner turns to God while another turns to bloodthirsty vengeance in the face of death. But Lawrence, ever the sloppy sidekick, makes clear that spirituality and peace are only fodder for jokes and neither partner will regain his manhood until there’s a massive weapon between his legs and he’s shooting Mexicans out of the sky.
Will Mike learn to love? Will he whip his tech-savvy and law abiding new team into shape (that is, help them to embrace lethal and mainly illegal justice)?