Hammer Time!

 

by George Wolf

 

The very superhero nature of Thor presents a catch-22 for his standalone film installments. The medieval themes which anchor the character don’t really lend themselves to the fun we expect from Avengers films, yet leaving these themes behind would render any Thor adventure rather pointless.

The first film found a way to balance things quite nicely, establishing the blueprint that Thor:  The Dark World revises in even more impressive fashion.

The filmmakers made two smart moves right off the bat:  1) making Jane Foster (Natalie Portman) more than a bystander, and 2) bringing Loki (Tom Hiddleston) back for another round.

Well-rounded villains can make or break these films, and, in Hiddleston’s capable hands, Loki is the most interesting character on the screen. Sentenced to life in an Asgard prison by King Odin (Anthony Hopkins, finding just the right regal tone), Loki suddenly finds himself in high demand.

On Earth, Jane has stumbled into one the portals between worlds, and she becomes the keeper of something an ancient Dark Lord wants very badly. To save Jane and, a bit more importantly, the universe, Thor and Loki have to put aside old grudges and work together.

Director Alan Taylor comes with some serious medieval bonafides, directing several episodes of …pause for a moment of suitably reverential fanboy silence…Game of Thrones. His instincts for the pacing and framework needed to keep the Asgard scenes vital is spot on. While this may not be surprising, Taylor also shows himself to be more than capable of keeping the fun meter jumping as well.

The lively script, while a bit complicated in the early stages, settles into a very enjoyable rhythm that Taylor exploits well. Expect some nice surprises, of both the dark and light variety, as the film builds to an impressive final battle. Screenwriters Christopher Yost,  Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely even manage to land a few subtle jabs about the folly of war and how easily one army’s hero can resemble another’s zealot. Well played.

As Thor himself, Chris Hemsworth again displays a mix of charisma, physique and temperament that makes the role his own.  His scenes with Hiddleston are a mischievous hoot, both actors seemingly locked in to both their characters and the expectations of one another.

Aside from one curiously low-tech moment of Thor taking flight, much of the film’s 3D presentation looks fantastic, with a broader, more heroic gloss. In particular, an Asgard ceremony set amid candle lights and waterfalls is downright stunning.

The only thing keeping Thor:  The Dark World from superhero elite status is a first act that drags a bit. Once that is vanquished, acts two and three bring richer storytelling than we have seen from Thor. Yes, this film is darker, but it’s also more fun.

And, keep in your seat for two extra scenes.

 

Verdict-3-5-Stars

 

 

This Week’s Countdown: Best Onscreen ‘Staches

The Mo-vember episode of the Studio 35 Show got us thinking ‘staches. What are the best onscreen mustaches? We chose our 10 favorites. Which big, hairy faces did we miss?

 10. Charles Bronson

Hard saying which set of whiskers is more impressive, Charles Bronson’s:

Charles-BRONSON

 

 

 

 

 

 

Or Tom Hardy in the title role for the film Bronson, so we’ll call it a tie:

bronson-trailer

 

 

 

9. Yosemite Sam

Sure, Snidely Whiplash was impressive, but when it comes to mustachioed animated gentlemen, we like the bold statement made by Sam.

yosemite_sam

 

 

 

 

8. Wilford Brimley

Our favorite cantankerous man with a mustache, Brimley and his whiskers have been making the world safe for oatmeal and extra terrestrials for generations.

5792788b1850b4ecd8b6dfc409b60bb9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. Robert Redford

You forget how handsome the Seventies could be until you gander at the young Redford, who can even make an unruly mo’ look good.

butch-cassidy-and-the-sundance-kid-robert-redford-1969_i-G-67-6716-DIKA100Z

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. Mike Ditka

Best NFL ‘stache (and sweater and sunglasses). He’s our Ditka.

mike_ditka_1987_11_11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Tom  Selleck

Can’t list famous mustaches without this hirsute Eighties PI.

Tom-Selleck

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Burt Reynolds

Let’s be honest, the entire Eighties boom in mustaches is due to Tom Selleck and this man. Thank you?

 

burtreynolds-smokeybandit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. The Cast of Tombstone

More facial hair per square screen inch, Tombstone makes other films seem positively unmanly.

tombstone1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Ron Burgundy

This mustache escalated quickly. With a mustache like this, you have to keep your head on a swivel. It stings the nostrils.

ron-burgundy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Sam Elliott

Yes, he made the countdown twice! He’s the  most impressive part of the Stache Pack that makes up the cast of Tombstone, but the manliness that is Sam Elliot’s facial hair cannot be adequately praised with only one slot on this countdown! It’d be very undude of us.

sam_elliott_the_big_lebowski

The Weirdest Place on Earth!

 

by George Wolf

 

And the award for “Best Gimmick of the Year” goes to..Escape from Tomorrow!

Seriously. In his first project, writer/director Randy Moore risked the wrath of Mickey and covertly filmed inside Walt Disney World, piecing together the story of a family vacation gone very, very weird.

There’s really no point in trying to describe it any other way.  Even if the plot could be summarized, it would spoil the perverse joy of watching the film go places you can’t possibly see coming.

The acting is pedestrian at best, some of the segments not filmed at the theme park have laughably low production values, and Moore’s overall point gets muddied in the madness.

Does he hate the Disney machine and all it stands for? Is he using the resort to make a larger point about consumer culture running rampant? Or, does he just want to produce something unique, and have a little Goofy fun at the expense of an American institution?

It often seems as if a point was secondary, an afterthought to the fun of getting away with filming under Disney’s nose.  Moore gives the movie alternating streaks of satire and outright contempt, but cannot cannot find the cohesive voice needed to make it all work.

It’s a shame, because Moore was onto something here. As the film begins, you’re excited at the possibilities of what he is doing, only to have your enthusiasm strain under the weight of weirdness.

Still, Escape from Tomorrow offers a few low-brow laughs and a film experience that is truly unlike any other. If that’s enough for you, well, hey, it is a small world after all!

Sorry.

 

Verdict-3-0-Stars

 

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nfU_5NWBoE

“It’s Not D&D!”

 

by George Wolf

 

Here’s how much of a gamer I am not:  it took years -check that- decades for me to realize the great “zero charisma!” taunt from Elliot to his brother in E.T. was a Dungeons & Dragons reference.

In the film Zero Charisma, “Game Master” Scott (Sam Eidson) isn’t interested in D&D either. Instead, his world revolves around the role-playing board game he himself invented and plays regularly with three other social outcasts. If you’ve already guessed that Scott is a full grown man who still lives at home, give yourself ten “I know a guy like this” points.

Suddenly, there is a disturbance in the force, as one of the regulars has to drop out of the ongoing contest. A chance meeting with Miles (Garret Graham) leads to Scott extending an invitation he soon regrets.

Miles is smart, funny and sociable. He brings beer over and has a sexy girlfriend who apparently has a healthy sexual appetite. “You know what that’s like!” Miles exclaims to the group.

If the resulting open-mouth stares of wonder are any indication, no, they do not know what that is like at all.

The harder Scott tries to control his world, the more it falls apart, as writer/co-director Andrew Matthews, in his debut feature, displays a nice feel for social satire and dark comedy.  The game of “Scott vs. Miles” overshadows the role-playing exercise, as Scott becomes even more unlikeable, preying on his friends’ insecurities in an attempt to convince them that Miles is not what he seems.

Zero Charisma is often able to shine an uncomfortable light into the dark corners of alienation and social responsibility. Though it pulls back a bit at the finish to ensure matters are properly tidied up, Game Master Sam’s world is worth looking into.

 

Verdict-3-5-Stars

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=768wJZoqB9Q

5 Oscar Winners Wasted

 

by George Wolf

 

By the end of Last Vegas, you get the feeling everyone involved had a darn good time filming it. Robert DeNiro, Michael Douglas, Morgan Freeman and Kevin Kline got to hang together in Vegas for a few weeks, give the script the half-hearted effort it deserves, and leave happy.

Nice work if you can get it, too bad their fun doesn’t rub off on the rest of us.

The four Oscar winners play Paddy, Billy, Archie and Sam, lifelong friends who agree to meet in sin city for a..what else-bachelor party-just before Billy (Douglas) marries a woman less than half his age. Paddy (DeNiro) is still mourning the loss of his wife, while Archie (Freeman) is running from his overprotective son and Sam (Kline) has been given a hall pass by Mrs. Sam.

The guys are in Vegas about thirty seconds when they meet a beguiling lounge singer (Mary Steenburgen, making it 5 Oscar winners wasted in this cast) who is of course more than willing to be the Shirley MacLaine in their Rat Pack.

All these vets together on screen should be more of a hoot, but Dan Fogelman‘s screenplay never gives them the chance.  Instead, we get lazy age gags, sit-com obviousness and force fed attempts at character development.

Fogelman is an odd bird. He’s capable of smart, nuanced efforts such as Crazy, Studio, Love., but is just as likely to churn out losers the likes of The Guilt Trip. Last Vegas is closer to the latter, with a dependency on telling you about the characters when showing you works so much better. Throwing us a funny bone or two would also have helped.

Director Jon Turtletaub (National Treasure/The Sorcerer’s Apprentice) is content to keep his eyes on the wrap party, as the slapped- together scenes shine with the polish of one, maybe even two full takes.

Look, this is a Vegas bachelor party movie, so I gotta say it:  The Hangover may not have invented the niche, but it damn sure perfected it.  Strangely, by lifting a couple scenes from that film, Last Vegas seems to invite the comparison.

Not a good idea.

Verdict-2-0-Stars

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKiLs1iBgmg

Halloween Calendar, Day 31: The Exorcist

 

The Exorcist (1973)

The Exorcist gets a bad rap for being too Catholic, too traditional, anti-feminist. I read an account from a self-proclaimed Satanist who disliked it because the devil would never be so easily foiled. But for evocative, nerve jangling, demonic horror, you will not find better.

Director William Friedkin’s career is spotted with tepid-to-awful films, but when he cranks out a good one, look out. Hot on the heels of the verite action of his Oscar-winning The French Connection – a film that subverted expectations by casting seriously flawed heroes who don’t manage to resolve the film’s conflict – he made an abrupt left with this one.

Slow-moving, richly textured, gorgeously and thoughtfully framed, The Exorcist follows a very black and white, good versus evil conflict: Father Merrin V Satan for the soul of an innocent child.

But thanks to an intricate and nuanced screenplay adapted by William Peter Blatty from his own novel, the film boasts any number of flawed characters struggling to find faith and to do what’s right in this situation. And thanks to Friedkin’s immaculate filming, we are entranced by early wide shots of a golden Middle East, then brought closer to watch people running here and there on the Georgetown campus or on the streets of NYC.

Then we pull in a bit more: interiors of Chris MacNeil’s (Ellen Burstyn) place on location, the hospital where Fr. Karras’s mother is surrounded by forgotten souls, the labs and conference rooms where an impotent medical community fails to cure poor Regan (Linda Blair).

Then even closer, in the bedroom, where you can see Regan’s breath in the chilly air, and examine the flesh rotting off her young face. Here, in the intimacy, there’s no escaping that voice, toying with everyone with such vulgarity.

The voice belongs to Mercedes McCambridge, and she may have been the casting director’s greatest triumph. Of course, Jason Miller as poor, wounded Fr. Damien Karras could not have been better. Indeed, he, Burstyn and young Linda Blair were all nominated for Oscars.

So was Friedkin, the director who balanced every scene to expose its divinity and warts, and to quietly build tension. When he was good and ready, he let that tension burst into explosions of terrifying mayhem that became a blueprint for dozens of films throughout the Seventies and marked a lasting icon for the genre.

Remember the stories of moviegoers fleeing the theatre, or fainting in the aisles midway through this film? It seemed like hype then, but watch it today, experience the power the film still has, and you can only imagine how little the poor folks of the early 1970s were prepared.

Even after all this time, The Exorcist is a flat-out masterpiece.

 

Transcendent Filmmaking

12 Years a Slave

by Hope Madden

Remarkable, isn’t it, that it took a foreign-born filmmaker, with the help of a mostly foreign-born cast, to properly tell the shamefully American tale 12 Years a Slave.

Steve McQueen is the British director who artfully and impeccably translates Solomon Northup’s memoir of illegal captivity to the screen. Northup, played with breathtaking beauty by Chiwetel Ejiofor, was a free family man in New York State, a violinist by trade, duped, drugged, shackled and sold into slavery in Louisiana. We are privy to the next 12 years of this man’s life, and while it is often brutally difficult to watch, it’s also a tale so magnificently told it must not be missed.

Chiwetel Ejiofor is an intense talent, though you have likely never heard of him and have possibly never seen him. But if you happened to have come across Britain’s 2002 thriller Dirty Pretty Things and spied his tender, heart-wrenching turn as Okwe, a Nigerian immigrant fallen into sketchy company in London,  you knew he was destined for great things.

He’s found that destiny in 12 Years a Slave.

The clear Oscar frontrunner, Ejiofor is not alone as a favorite this award season. McQueen populates his understated, graceful picture with one of the most perfectly chosen casts in memory. Even the smallest role leaves a scalding impression. Whether it’s Paul Giamatti’s casual evil, Benedict Cumberbatch’s cowardly mercy, Paul Dano’s spineless rage or Adepero Oduye’s unbridled grief, there’s an emotional authenticity to the film that makes every character, no matter how brief their appearance in Northup’s odyssey, memorable – sometimes painfully so.

But there are three performances you will likely never forget. Principally, there is Ejiofor, a performer who expresses more conflict, anguish and thought with his eyes than most actors can hope to share in an entire performance. His work roils with emotions few would care to consider, and never does he bend to melodrama or overstatement.

In her film debut, Lupita Nyong’o’s almost otherworldly performance marks a profound talent.

Meanwhile, as the sadistic Master Epps, Michael Fassbender’s performance guarantees to be the most brilliantly unsettling piece of acting found onscreen this year. There is no stronger contender in this year’s Oscar race for best supporting actor, and likely none will show himself. He’s terrifying, and his performance feeds off the talent around him. The raw energy among the three – Fassbender, Ejiofor and Nyong’o – is sometimes too much to bear, and the three share a few scenes that are nearly too powerful to take in.

McQueen does not let the cast run away with his picture, though, and he mines a deep human beauty from Northup’s journey. He never forgets that while justice requires that Northup be delivered from slavery, it remains blind to all those people left on Epps’s plantation, many of whom faced a far more dire existence than Northup.

No romanticizing, no comic relief, just the abject truth of what will happen to a man, a woman, a young boy, and a little girl who is owned outright by the kind of human who believes owning another human is justified. It’s almost beyond comprehension, due not only to the fact it happened for 250 years in our own history, but  because across the globe, it still happens every day in the world’s booming sex trade industry.

12 Years a Slave transcends filmmaking, ultimately become an event, one that is destined to leave a profound, lasting impression.

Verdict-5-0-Stars

 

Game Over, Man! Game Over!

Ender’s Game

by Hope Madden

A gawky adolescent plays video games and saves the world. It’s easy to see why Orson Scott Card’s novel Ender’s Game is so popular with young boys. But the truth is that this SciFi thriller is more than just a simple adolescent male fantasy. It’s an intricately written coming of age story that pulls readers in, not just with the video game storyline, but a video game structure, as the hero defeats certain challenges before moving on to the next level, so to speak.

Though his screenplay is often inelegant in its adaptation, clunking through sections that must have been quite impressive in novel form, writer/director Gavin Hood’s affection for the source material is evident. So, too, is his skill with FX as well as casting.

Asa Butterfield (Hugo) leads the cast as Ender Wiggin, the pinch-shouldered spindle hoping to make it through the ranks of the military academy to help defend earth against an impending alien invasion. Butterfield’s vulnerability – physical and emotional – and obvious intelligence provide the character the compelling internal conflict the role requires.

SciFi legend Harrison Ford shows some effort as Ender’s commanding officer, while the always wonderful Viola Davis gives the film its emotional core, and allows Hood an opportunity to mine this story for some social commentary. “It used to be a war crime to recruit soldiers younger than 15,” she scolds Ford’s Colonel Graff.

Though visually impressive, the film’s cosmic FX pale in comparison to the entirely superior Gravity. Still, Hood knows how to put a crowd in the middle of a video game without giving off the immediately dated feel of Tron.

Though sometimes derivative, (Act 2 feels a bit too much like Top Gun, if you substitute teenaged video game nerds for hot, ambiguously gay volleyball players), the film eventually packs an emotional wallop. The climax is effective, but the resolution is rushed. These issues are symptomatic of the effort as a whole – fitfully entertaining, absorbing and gorgeous, and yet tonally challenged and poorly paced.

Hood’s greatest failing is that he settles for a thrill ride when he was handed a beloved, epic coming of age tragedy. Oddly enjoyable and intermittently wonderful, the film still feels like a mild letdown.

Verdict-3-0-Stars

Halloween Calendar, Day 30: Wolf Creek

 

Wolf Creek (2005)

There have long been filmmakers whose ultimate goal is entertainment; the idea being that art is meant to affect, not entertain. These filmmakers, from Sam Peckinpah to Lars von Trier, generally develop impenetrable indie credibility and a line of devoted, bawling fans. No one in recent memory has applied this ideology to horror cinema as effectively as writer/director Greg McLean with his Outback opus Wolf Creek.

Some of the best scares in film have come as the reaction to urbanites’ fear of losing the tentative grasp on our own link in the food chain once we find ourselves in the middle of nowhere. With Wolf Creek, it’s as if McLean looked at American filmmakers’ preoccupation with backwoods thrillers and scoffed, in his best Mick Dundee, “That’s not the middle of nowhere. This is the middle of nowhere.”

A quick glimpse of a map of Australia points out that nearly every city with a population higher than that of an Ohio State University dorm is along the coastline. McLean explores the isolated beauty of this vast, empty middle with spectacularly creepy results.

Using only digital cameras to enhance an ultra-naturalistic style, McLean’s happy backpackers find themselves immobile outside Wolf Creek National Park when their car stops running. As luck would have it, friendly bushman Mick Taylor (John Jarratt) drives up offering a tow back to his camp, where he promises to fix the vehicle.

If this sounds predictable and obvious to you, rest assured that McLean has plans to burst every cliché in the genre, and he succeeds on almost every level.

His first triumph is in the acting. Jarratt’s killer is an amiable sadist who is so real it’s jarring. You find yourself hoping he’s an actor. His performance singlehandedly shames the great Tobe Hooper and Wes Craven, whose backwoods horror films relied so completely on caricatures for villains.

A horror film this realistic is not only hard to watch, but a bit hard to justify. What makes an audience interested in observing human suffering so meticulously recreated? This is where, like a true artist, McLean finally succeeds. What is as unsettling as the film itself is that its content is somehow satisfying.

 

A Powerful Quest

 

by Richard Ades

 

Focusing on a young girl who masquerades as someone she’s not, Wadjda takes aim at the patriarchal elements of Saudi Arabia, where a conservative interpretation of Islam prevents women from even obtaining driver’s licenses. 

Wadjda (an irresistible Waad Mohammed) is easy to spot in her all-girl school—she’s the one wearing worn sneakers under her ankle-length uniform. Though she would be a typical preteen in most parts of the world, Wadjda’s love of pop music and her tomboyish adventures with boy pal Abdullah (Abdullrahman Al Gohani) mark her as a rebel in the school’s repressive atmosphere.

Then two things happen that change her life: (1) She spots a beautiful bicycle that she decides she must have, even though cycling is considered hazardous to a girl’s virtue. And (2) the school announces a Quran competition whose prize money is almost identical to the bike’s cost. The enterprising girl immediately undertakes a study of Islam’s holy book, fooling the school’s staff into thinking she’s suddenly found religion.

Directed by Haifaa Al Mansour, the film also focuses on Wadjda’s mother (Reem Abdullah), a woman with her own set of problems. She attempts to live by her society’s strict rules, which mean covering up from head to toe and hiring a foreign-born driver when she wants to venture outside the home. But she’s increasingly feeling the sting of patriarchy, particularly because her loving but largely absent husband (Sultan Al Asaaf) is planning to take a second wife who can give him the son he needs to carry on his bloodline.

The mother’s emotional conflicts are shown in subtle ways, as in the primping she engages in before putting on a garment that hides her handiwork from the public. Similarly, Wadjda’s feelings toward her situation—her father’s imminent remarriage and the increasing strictures she’s expected to follow—must be gleaned from her expressive eyes.

Wadjda carries two distinctions: It’s the first full-length film made entirely in Saudi Arabia, and it’s the first feature directed by a Saudi woman. But its most important distinction is the disarming and subtly powerful way in which it depicts the ordeal of growing up female in a patriarchal society.

 

Verdict-5-0-Stars

 

 

 

Richard Ades covers theater and film at Columbustheater.org.

 

Hope Madden and George Wolf … get it?